当前位置: X-MOL 学术China-EU Law Journal › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Automated communication and basic rights
China-EU Law Journal Pub Date : 2019-01-09 , DOI: 10.1007/s12689-018-0081-y
Meinhard Schröder

Nowadays communication does not necessarily originate from humans, but also from “machines” such as “social bots” or “things” in the Internet of Things. From a basic rights perspective, this phenomenon raises the question if such communication benefits from the same level of protection as communication created by human beings. With regard to the basic rights of the Grundgesetz, the Federal Constitutional Court for years has been excluding some forms of communication from the scope of protection as not needing or deserving protection. The ratio of these decisions must not be applied to cases of automated communication without noticing possible differences. Automated communication can mostly be linked to the human beings or legal entities applying it. Therefore, its prohibition or regulation is a matter of proportionality of infringements with fundamental rights.

中文翻译:

自动通讯和基本权利

如今,通信并不一定起源于人类,还起源于诸如物联网中的“社交机器人”或“事物”之类的“机器”。从基本权利的角度来看,这种现象提出了这样的问题:这种交流是否受益于与人类创造的交流相同的保护水平。关于Grundgesetz的基本权利,多年来,联邦宪法法院一直在将某些形式的通信排除在保护范围之内,因为它们不需要或不应该得到保护。在不注意可能的差异的情况下,不得将这些决定的比例应用于自动通信的情况。自动通信通常可以链接到应用它的人类或法人实体。所以,
更新日期:2019-01-09
down
wechat
bug