ABSTRACT

Drawing on the collapse of Morandi bridge (Genoa, Italy) exemplar and unique case and by applying a content analysis to the declarations made by politicians in the subsequent months after the tragedy, the paper highlights how longstanding debates about the relative merits of concessions vis a vis direct public operations can become the terrain of intense political contestation in the wake of a public tragedy. In particular, it shows how PPPs predicated on transferring risks to the partner best able to manage them create opportunities for blame shifting by politicians, bureaucracies and firms when failures occur.

中文翻译：

---

大型项目灾难后公私合作伙伴关系的政治化：莫兰迪大桥倒塌案例

摘要

借鉴莫兰迪桥（意大利热那亚）倒塌的典型和独特案例，并通过对悲剧发生后几个月内政界人士发表的声明进行内容分析，该论文强调了关于让步相对优点的长期争论在公共悲剧发生后，直接的公共运营可能会成为激烈的政治争论的领域。特别是，它展示了以将风险转移给最有能力管理风险的合作伙伴为前提的 PPP，如何在失败发生时为政治家、官僚机构和公司的责任转移创造机会。