Abstract The article deals with limitation of claims in Poland, Ukraine and Germany. The authors made a conclusion that the most liberal solution in the area of contractual regulation of limitation is provided in the German Civil Code, which allows shortening and prolonging the statutory limitation period, whereas the most severe is provided for in the Polish Civil Code, prohibiting it altogether. An indirect solution has been adopted by the Ukrainian Civil Code, which allows only the extension of the statutory limitation period. These different legislative solutions demonstrate that the national legislators are partially different in their view of the reasons justifying the statute of limitations. Newer prescription regulations, to which the German and Ukrainian ones belong, are largely similar to each other. The same can be said about the Polish academic project of the general section of the civil code. The Principles of European Contract Law have had a significant impact on teaching of civil law, as well as on national legislators.

中文翻译：

---

在欧洲合同法和德国民法典背景下的波兰和乌克兰民法典中的索赔限制

摘要本文涉及波兰，乌克兰和德国的索赔限制。作者得出的结论是，德国的《民法典》规定了对时效的合同规制领域最宽松的解决方案，这可以缩短和延长法定时效期限，而波兰的《民法典》则规定了最严厉的解决方案，禁止一共。乌克兰民法采用了间接解决方案，该解决方案仅允许延长法定时效期限。这些不同的立法解决方案表明，国家立法者在限制时效理由合理的观点方面存在部分差异。德国和乌克兰所属的较新的处方规定在很大程度上彼此相似。关于民法典总则的波兰学术项目也可以这样说。《欧洲合同法原则》对民法教学以及国家立法者都产生了重大影响。