In personnel- and educational selection, a substantial gap exists between research and practice, since evidence-based assessment instruments and decision-making procedures are underutilized. We provide an overview of studies that investigated interventions to encourage the use of evidence-based assessment methods, or factors related to their use. The most promising studies were grounded in self-determination theory. Training and autonomy in the design of evidence-based assessment methods were positively related to their use, while negative stakeholder perceptions decreased practitioners’ intentions to use evidence-based assessment methods. Use of evidence-based decision-making procedures was positively related to access to such procedures, information to use it, and autonomy over the procedure, but negatively related to receiving outcome feedback. A review of the professional selection literature showed that the implementation of evidence-based assessment was hardly discussed. We conclude with an agenda for future research on encouraging evidence-based assessment practice.

在人员和教育选择方面，研究和实践之间存在很大差距，因为基于证据的评估工具和决策程序未得到充分利用。我们提供了对干预措施进行研究的概述，这些干预措施旨在鼓励采用循证评估方法或与使用这些评估方法相关的因素。最有前途的研究基于自决理论。设计基于证据的评估方法的培训和自主性与使用它们正相关，而利益相关者的消极看法降低了从业者使用基于证据的评估方法的意图。基于证据的决策程序的使用与访问此类程序，使用该程序的信息以及该程序的自治性成正相关，而与接收结果反馈则成负相关。对专业selection选文献的回顾表明，几乎没有讨论过基于证据的评估的实施。我们以鼓励基于证据的评估实践的未来研究议程作为结尾。