Because many websites claim to provide information about evidence-based practices (EBPs), consumers must know the information and practices are based upon quality research. Practitioners may intend to locate trustworthy online sources providing EBPs, but if those sources are not easy to navigate and lack implementation resources (i.e., are accessible), then practitioners may be more likely to access less trustworthy sources for instructional strategies and materials. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate websites, identified as trust or trust with caution, to determine whether they demonstrate a level of usefulness for practitioners. Thirty websites, classified as trust and trust with caution, were reviewed for usefulness and results indicated 14 (46.7%) websites were found to be useful, nine (30%) websites were categorized as somewhat useful, and seven (23.3%) websites were determined to be not useful. Suggestions for future research and implications for practice are provided.

因为许多网站声称提供有关循证实践（EBP）的信息，所以消费者必须知道这些信息和实践是基于质量研究的。从业者可能打算找到提供EBP的可信赖的在线资源，但是如果这些资源不易浏览且缺乏实施资源（即可访问），那么从业者可能更有可能访问不太可信赖的教学策略和材料。因此，本研究的目的是评估被识别为信任或谨慎信任的网站，以确定它们是否显示出对从业人员有用的水平。三十个网站，谨慎分类为信任和信任进行了审查，结果显示14个（46.7％）网站有用，九个（30％）网站被归类为有点有用，而七个（23.3％）网站被确定为不有用。提供了对未来研究的建议以及对实践的启示。