How do social movements include or exclude intersectional grievances of individual participants? What do variations in framing within the movement tell us about including intersectional grievances? I address these questions by examining frames deployed by anganwadi (childcare) workers in India and their organized union’s documented demands. I utilize a systemic intersectional approach to examine two specific grievances—low wages and weakening of public provision of care—that lie at the intersection of gender, caste, class, and care work. Workers use intersectional frames to interpret grievances, as they experience intersectional inequalities of gender, caste, and class. Findings show that the union targets the state alone while workers target both state and society. As intersectional grievances are durable inequalities that traverse across the boundaries of state and society, social movement frames may need a broader prognosis that targets both state and society to include intersectional grievances.

社交运动如何包括或排除个体参与者的交叉抱怨？机芯内镜架的变化如何告诉我们包括相交的不满？我通过检查印度的anganwadi（托儿所）工人部署的框架以及他们有组织的工会记录在案的要求，来解决这些问题。我采用系统性的交叉研究方法，考察了性别，种姓，阶级和护理工作的交汇处的两个具体申诉，即低工资和公共护理的削弱。工人会遇到性别，种姓和阶级的不平等现象，因此使用相交框架来解释抱怨。研究结果表明，工会仅针对国家，而工人针对国家和社会。