In recent years, the comparative perspective has become increasingly used as a methodological approach to human rights research in the scientific literature. This paper is not intended to summarise the virtues and shortcomings that can be attributed to comparative legal research in the specific field of human rights. Rather, its aim is to critically reconsider its interdisciplinary role and, in particular, to reflect on two of the most popular methods in this field of research: legal comparison and the case study method. Firstly, this paper reviews the method in question, including its typologies and grounds for use. Secondly, it outlines the techniques that determine what and how to compare. Finally, a SWOT evaluation of comparative legal research on human rights is provided, identifying its strengths and weaknesses in order to dispel false myths.

中文翻译：

---

人权比较法研究中的工具，空白与错误的神话

近年来，比较观点已越来越多地用作科学文献中人权研究的一种方法论方法。本文无意总结可归因于特定人权领域的比较法律研究的优点和缺点。相反，它的目的是批判性地重新考虑其跨学科的作用，尤其是要反思该研究领域中两种最流行的方法：法律比较和案例研究方法。首先，本文回顾了所讨论的方法，包括其类型和使用依据。其次，它概述了确定比较内容和方法的技术。最后，提供了对人权比较法律研究的SWOT评估，确定了其优缺点，以消除错误的神话。