Abstract This article lists the content and deals with the criteria for assessing the presence or absence of material damage suffered by the applicant to the European Court of Human Rights, the subject of entrepreneurship, as a new condition for the admissibility of an individual application. The article establishes that the list and content of the criteria for assessing the presence or absence of material damage suffered by the applicant to the European Court of Human Rights are different for individuals and for legal entities – business entities. Moreover, the article initiates a discussion on the list and content of these criteria for the subjects of entrepreneurship – the applicants to the European Court of Human Rights. In the light of the Court’s practice, the author reveals their content as well as legal categories such as ‘substantial harm’, ‘financial harm’, ‘pecuniary damage’, ‘non-pecuniary damage’ incurred by the applicant, the subject of entrepreneurship, and highlights the issues to which objectives may be caused by ‘moral harm’ in case of violation of the rights of the subject of entrepreneurship.

中文翻译：

---

法律实体在欧洲人权法院的适用：作为可受理性的重大不利条件

摘要本文列出了内容并探讨了评估申请人是否遭受企业家精神所遭受的实质性损害的标准，这是受理个人申请的新条件。该条款确定，个人和法人实体（企业实体）评估申请人是否遭受欧洲人权法院遭受的物质损害的标准清单和内容是不同的。此外，本文就有关企业家精神主题的这些标准的清单和内容（即欧洲人权法院的申请人）展开了讨论。根据法院的惯例，