当前位置: X-MOL 学术Soc. Issues Policy Rev. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
From Backlash to Inclusion for All: Instituting Diversity Efforts to Maximize Benefits Across Group Lines
Social Issues and Policy Review ( IF 9.857 ) Pub Date : 2018-01-01 , DOI: 10.1111/sipr.12040
Tiffany N. Brannon 1 , Evelyn R. Carter 1 , Lisel Alice Murdock-Perriera 2 , Gerald D. Higginbotham 1
Affiliation  

Recent real-world events in which diversity policies and practices have been met with severe backlash can prompt a zero-sum perception of inclusion efforts. This article offers theory-based insights for instituting diversity initiatives that can afford inclusion for all—allowing institutions to reap the benefits of diversity efforts while reducing the costs of backlash. Using an inclusion for all framework we highlight three salient, interrelated, sources of backlash tied to dominant group members’ goals and motivations: (1) perceived or actual restriction of independence or autonomy, (2) preference for the status quo and colorblindness, and (3) beliefs that racial and other social equalities have been reached. Throughout, we emphasize an intergroup focus that recognizes the interdependent yet often divergent goals and motivations of marginalized and dominant groups. Mainstream

中文翻译:

从强烈反对到全民包容:开展多元化努力,最大程度地提高集团收益

最近在现实世界中发生了多样性政策和实践遭到严重反弹的事件,这可能促使人们对包容性努力的认识为零和。本文提供了基于理论的见解,以建立可以让所有人都参与的多元化计划,从而使机构能够从多元化努力中受益,同时降低抵制成本。使用所有框架的包含物,我们突出显示了与主要组成员的目标和动机相关的三个明显的,相互关联的抵制根源:(1)对独立性或自主性的感知或实际限制;(2)对现状和色盲的偏爱;以及(3)认为已经实现了种族平等和其他社会平等。自始至终,我们强调以群体间的关注为基础,该关注认识到边缘化群体和优势群体之间相互依存但往往存在分歧的目标和动机。主流
更新日期:2018-01-01
down
wechat
bug