This article focuses on the utilisation of but in English at turn-final placement regarding provisions for what follows next, where the token is not a display of a traditional sense of content-level contrasts. The production of final buts in this article is a point of expansion relevance and emergent as a means of intersubjectively creating another opportunity space to deal with the ongoing disaffiliation or lack of resources. My observations particularly unpack the contextual properties of final buts. First, a but-turn is designed not strictly to show a partial agreement and back down from the original statement. It can be more plausibly argued that the but-turn indicates which resource of interaction is (or is not) requested at that specific moment to accomplish the ongoing agenda. Second, a projected action of reworking can be formulated in collaborative completion with a co-participant explicating the account to the but-turn.

本文的重点是在回合决赛中使用，而是使用英语介绍接下来的规定，其中令牌不是传统的内容级别对比的显示。本文中final但是s的产生是与扩展相关的，并且作为一种主体间地创造另一种机会空间来应对持续的裁军或资源匮乏的手段而出现。我的观察特别揭示了final但是s的上下文属性。首先，而是转角设计不严格，显示了部分协议，并从原来的语句退缩。它可以更振振有词地认为，但-turn指示在那个特定时刻请求（或不请求）哪种交互资源来完成正在进行的议程。其次，改造的投影操作可以在协作完成制定一个共同参加显性化账户的，但转角。