In this short Beiträge three points relevant to the history of the Third Intermediate Period are presented.

1. The genealogical data of the family of the army scribe Nespaqashuty written on a fragmentary block statue from Karnak have hitherto been misunderstood. The owner of the statue is not Nespaqashuty ii, who lived in the time of Siamun, but a grandson of Amenemone i. The statue may have been dedicated by his son Ankhefenkhons during the time of Osorkon ii.

2. According to stela Cairo je 66285, the Libyan chief and later king Shoshenq i had a statue of his father Nimlot A erected in the temple of Abydos. The offering established for this statue is written with a hieroglyph simply to be read ḥtp “offering,” not ẖntj “statue” or qnyt “portable image” as proposed before.

3. Some aspects of the chronological and political relations between Bocchoris and Shabako and their predecessors Tefnakhte and Piankhy are considered as well as the supposed reason for the attack on Bocchoris by “Sabakôn.”

在这段简短的贝特雷格（Beiträge）中，提出了与第三中期历史相关的三点。

1.迄今为止，人们误解了写在卡纳克神父的碎片雕像上的军人划线员奈斯帕卡舒蒂的家谱。雕像的拥有者不是居住在锡门时期的Nespaqashuty ii，而是Amenemone i的孙子。这座雕像可以在Osorkon的时间一直致力于通过他的儿子Ankhefenkhons II。

2.根据石碑开罗JE 66285，利比亚首席后来王Shoshenq我有他父亲的雕像Nimlot一个在阿比多斯神庙竖起。这个雕像建立的产品用象形文字写只是为了读HTP “的产品，”不ẖntj “雕像”或qnyt以前那样提出“便携式图像”。

3.博科里里斯和沙巴科及其前任特夫纳赫特和皮安基之间在时间和政治关系上的某些方面，以及“萨巴孔”袭击博科里里斯的推测原因均被考虑。