While an independent judiciary is considered an indispensable component of the rule of law, attacks of the domestic political power on the independence of the judicial branch are observed today in several European States. The European judges (CJUE, ECtHR) appear to be the “last soldier standing” in the defense of judicial independence and they have in no case remained indifferent. This contribution contains an analysis of the dynamic approaches that the CJEU and the ECtHR have adopted in order to reinforce the guarantees of independence that domestic judges enjoy under European Law (EU and ECHR law). An emphasis is put on the international judicial function of these Courts as protective and promoting judicial independence at the national level, arguing that both Courts assumed their role as guarantors of the common European value of the rule of law through a proactive stance, without going, however, to the extremes. Furthermore, the paper provides an examination on the fact that the European Courts have adopted measures in order to assure the effectiveness of the European guarantees of judicial independence. A particular focus is put on the protection through interim measures as a means of assuring an effective protection of the independence of national judges. Considering a comparative analysis, the issue of the ECtHR’s potential in this regard is hereby tackled, notably after the recent evolution in the case-law of the CJEU.

尽管独立司法机构被认为是法治必不可少的组成部分，但今天在几个欧洲国家中观察到国内政治权力对司法部门独立性的攻击。欧洲法官（CJUE，ECtHR）似乎是捍卫司法独立的“最后一站士兵”，他们在任何情况下都毫不动摇。这份文稿分析了欧洲法院和欧洲人权法院为加强国内法官根据欧洲法律（欧盟和欧洲人权法院法律）享有的独立性所采取的动态方法。强调这些法院的国际司法职能是在国家一级保护和促进司法独立，争辩说，两个法院都通过积极的立场承担了欧洲法治共同价值观的保证人角色，但是并没有走极端。此外，本文还对以下事实进行了审查：欧洲法院已采取措施以确保欧洲司法独立保障的有效性。特别关注通过临时措施提供保护，以确保有效保护国家法官的独立性。考虑到比较分析，特此在欧洲法院判例法最近的发展之后，解决了欧洲人权法院在这方面的潜力问题。本文对欧洲法院为确保欧洲司法独立保障措施的有效性而采取的措施这一事实进行了考察。特别关注通过临时措施提供保护，以确保有效保护国家法官的独立性。考虑到比较分析，特此在欧洲法院判例法最近的发展之后，解决了欧洲人权法院在这方面的潜力问题。本文对欧洲法院为确保欧洲司法独立保障措施的有效性而采取的措施这一事实进行了考察。特别关注通过临时措施提供保护，以确保有效保护国家法官的独立性。考虑到比较分析，特此在欧洲法院判例法最近的发展之后，解决了欧洲人权法院在这方面的潜力问题。