当前位置: X-MOL 学术Publications of the English Goethe Society › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Neology vs. Radical Enlightenment: Gotthilf Samuel Steinbart, Jakob Mauvillon, and Frederick the Great’s Essai sur l’Amour-propre envisagé comme Principe de Morale (1770)
Publications of the English Goethe Society Pub Date : 2021-07-05 , DOI: 10.1080/09593683.2021.1926063
Kevin Hilliard 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

This article discusses a pirated translation and edition of a work by the German theologian Gotthilf Samuel Steinbart (1738–1809) and shows that it can be attributed to Jakob Mauvillon (1743–1794), an important figure of the late Radical Enlightenment in Germany. In this Examen des motifs à la vertu (1774) Mauvillon submerges the primary text in a flood of commentary, with the aim of discrediting Steinbart’s claims. Steinbart’s work was itself a response to a treatise by Frederick II of Prussia (1712–1786). Mauvillon’s intervention was intended to warn against the alliance between church and state that he saw emerging in Frederick’s treatise and Steinbart’s response



中文翻译:

新学与激进启蒙:Gotthilf Samuel Steinbart、Jakob Mauvillon 和 Frederick the Great 的 Essai sur l'Amour-propre 设想 comme Principe de Morale (1770)

摘要

本文讨论了德国神学家 Gotthilf Samuel Steinbart(1738-1809 年)的一部作品的盗版翻译和版本,并表明它可以归因于雅各布·莫维隆(Jakob Mauvillon,1743-1794 年),德国晚期激进启蒙运动的重要人物。在这本书中,Mauvillon将原始文本淹没在大量评论中,目的是诋毁斯坦巴特的主张。斯坦巴特的作品本身就是对普鲁士腓特烈二世 (1712–1786) 的一篇论文的回应。Mauvillon 的干预意在警告他在 Frederick 的论文和 Steinbart 的回应中看到出现的教会与国家之间的联盟

更新日期:2021-07-05
down
wechat
bug