当前位置: X-MOL 学术Publishing Research Quarterly › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Disciplinary Fluidity: Academic Journals, Book Reviewing, Information and Knowledge Flow
Publishing Research Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-07-06 , DOI: 10.1007/s12109-021-09824-7
Jean-Pierre V. M. Hérubel 1
Affiliation  

Book reviews are an indicator of information and knowledge flow. This study explores and discusses the importance of disciplinary cultures among academic disciplines and disciplinary influence. Utilizing book reviews in disciplinary publications in history for the years 2016–2020, from two canonical history databases, a bibliometric view emerging of a selection of subjects reviewed in journals not associated with the disciplinary subject of research. Examination of book reviews for the fluidity of knowledge in academic disciplines provides evidence of information and knowledge flow in publishing academic books. Data and discussion further frames and situates the growing hybridization of subjects of research and their disciplinary publishing. Book reviews, as a barometer and approach to examining this phenomenon, illustrates book reviewing vis-à-vis academic disciplinary journals that are receptive to other disciplinary objects of research, not generally associated with that discipline. As scholarly research continues to metamorphose, book reviewing assumes a receptive and broader intellectual and publishing ecology.



中文翻译:

学科流动性:学术期刊、书评、信息和知识流

书评是信息和知识流的指标。本研究探讨并讨论了学科文化在学科和学科影响中的重要性。利用 2016 年至 2020 年历史学科出版物中的书评,从两个经典的历史数据库中,出现了与学科研究主题无关的期刊中所审查的选定主题的文献计量学观点。对学术学科知识流动性的书评检查提供了出版学术书籍中信息和知识流动的证据。数据和讨论进一步构建和定位了研究主题及其学科出版的日益混合。书评,作为检查这种现象的晴雨表和方法,说明了相对于接受其他学科研究对象的学术学科期刊的书评,但通常与该学科无关。随着学术研究的不断变化,书评呈现出一种包容性和更广泛的知识和出版生态。

更新日期:2021-07-07
down
wechat
bug