How does a national movement go local in places with multiple armed actors, simultaneously retaining credibility at the grass roots, while making claims and negotiating with the state? This article explores how a rights-based movement, the Right to Food (RTF) in India, with a strong national core and some state-level support expanded into areas that were experiencing militant insurgency. We find that the RTF movement was able to coexist with the militant groups because the movement: (a) brought new framings and issues to existing groups that were already working with vulnerable populations; and (b) distinguished itself from the militant groups in terms of substantive issues and approach (avoiding issues of displacement and land rights), as it was willing to work with the state to tackle issues of hunger and food entitlements.

中文翻译：

---

在脆弱环境中本地化国家责任要求：印度的食物权运动

民族运动如何在拥有多个武装参与者的地方进行本地化，同时在基层保持信誉，同时与国家提出主张并进行谈判？本文探讨了基于权利的运动，即印度的食物权 (RTF)，拥有强大的国家核心和一些州级支持，如何扩展到经历武装叛乱的地区。我们发现 RTF 运动能够与激进团体共存，因为该运动：(a) 为已经与弱势群体合作的现有团体带来了新的框架和问题；(b) 在实质性问题和方法（避免流离失所和土地权利问题）方面与激进组织不同，因为它愿意与国家合作解决饥饿和食物权利问题。