Mayer and Trezek offer a rejoinder to an article by Scott, Dostal, and Lane-Outlaw in which Scott et al. challenge the findings and conclusions of a literature review by Mayer and Trezek published in the Winter 2020 American Annals of the Deaf. Both the rejoinder and the article by Scott et al. appear in the Annals' Spring 2021 issue. Mayer and Trezek reiterate the rationale and aims of their review, as well as the process for conducting it, emphasizing the need for empirical evidence to inform policy and practice in deaf education. They also address observations made in terms of (a) factors to be considered when generating or consuming research and (b) the nature of the search procedures that are used. Mayer and Trezek conclude by restating the findings of their review and the implications of these findings for the field moving forward.

中文翻译：

---

根据证据提出索赔：对 Scott、Dostal 和 Lane-Outlaw 的反驳。

Mayer 和 Trezek 对 Scott、Dostal 和 Lane-Outlaw 的一篇文章进行了反驳，其中 Scott 等人。挑战 Mayer 和 Trezek 在 2020 年冬季美国聋人年鉴上发表的文献综述的发现和结论。反驳和斯科特等人的文章。出现在《年鉴》的 2021 年春季刊中。Mayer 和 Trezek 重申了他们审查的基本原理和目标，以及进行审查的过程，强调需要经验证据来为聋人教育的政策和实践提供信息。它们还解决了在 (a) 产生或使用研究时要考虑的因素和 (b) 所使用的搜索程序的性质方面所做的观察。Mayer 和 Trezek 最后重申了他们的审查结果以及这些发现对该领域向前发展的影响。