There is growing recognition that Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) (parklands, swales, ponds and green roofs, etc.) can reduce flood-risk and also benefit public health and improve environmental quality (air/water quality, biodiversity, etc.). Community engagement is critical to getting BGI implementation ‘right’ and producing more sustainable solutions, yet understandings of approaches differ and remain difficult to harmonize or resolve. A review of the extant literature shows that many guidelines frame communities in the passive 'recipient' mode, and remain quiet about the power relations framing and conditioning engagement. The paper then proposes a set of generic template principles for the development of community engagement frameworks to facilitate and encourage greater community co-production of BGI, with the hope that this could then improve public preferences, accountability, efficacy and sustainability.

人们越来越认识到蓝绿基础设施 (BGI)（公园地、洼地、池塘和绿色屋顶等）可以降低洪水风险，并有益于公众健康并改善环境质量（空气/水质量、生物多样性等） . 社区参与对于让 BGI 实施“正确”并产生更可持续的解决方案至关重要，但对方法的理解不同，仍然难以协调或解决。对现有文献的回顾表明，许多指南以被动的“接受者”模式构建社区，并且对构建和调节参与的权力关系保持沉默。然后，本文提出了一套通用模板原则，用于开发社区参与框架，以促进和鼓励 BGI 更大的社区联合生产，