This article explores the legal challenges related to the standing of indirectly injured states before the International Court of Justice in relation to violations of obligations erga omnes and erga omnes partes. After an examination of the emergence of these kinds of obligations, the article addresses the evolution of the approach of the Court in relation to the issue of standing, in light of the works of the International Law Commission on state responsibility. Especially after the 2012 Belgium v. Senegal case, the Court does not hesitate to recognise the standing of indirectly injured states. Yet, some aspects related to standing – such as the requirement of a special interests and the coordination between the reaction of the directly injured state and the indirectly injured ones – are still imprecise. The Court should take the opportunity to elaborate on these issues in the merits phase of The Gambia v. Myanmar case.

本文探讨了与间接受害国在违反普遍义务和普遍各方义务相关的国际法院诉讼中的法律挑战。在审查了这类义务的出现之后，本文根据国际法委员会关于国家责任的工作，探讨了法院在地位问题上的方法的演变。特别是在 2012 年比利时诉塞内加尔之后在这种情况下，法院毫不犹豫地承认间接受害国的地位。然而，与地位相关的一些方面——例如特殊利益的要求以及直接受害国与间接受害国的反应之间的协调——仍然是不精确的。法院应借此机会在冈比亚诉缅甸案的案情实质阶段详细阐述这些问题。