Both social movement research and the literature on the commons provide rich accounts of the anti-austerity mobilizations and uprisings in southern Europe. Movement studies offer important insights regarding the context of mobilization and collective claim making. The commons literature emphasizes bottom-up practices of shared ownership, self-management, and social co-production that move beyond institutional solutions. Although both literatures highlight similar phenomena, they remain relatively unconnected. Their distance precludes a full grasp of the implications regarding the dynamic and abundant to-and-fro movement between protest-based politics and everyday forms of collective action in this region, which is heavily affected by the crisis’ austerity management. Drawing on the South European context, this article rethinks key concepts addressed in both literatures (social movements-commons, activists-commoners, mobilization-commoning) and highlights how a conceptual synthesis can sharpen and (re)politicize the theorization of contemporary collective action in the everyday.

社会运动研究和关于公地的文献都为南欧的反紧缩动员和起义提供了丰富的描述。运动研究提供了关于动员和集体主张的背景的重要见解。公地文献强调超越制度解决方案的共享所有权、自我管理和社会共同生产的自下而上的实践。尽管这两篇文献都强调了相似的现象，但它们仍然相对没有联系。他们之间的距离使我们无法全面了解该地区以抗议为基础的政治与日常形式的集体行动之间动态而丰富的来回运动的含义，该地区受到危机紧缩管理的严重影响。借鉴南欧语境，