In this article I argue not only for the value of hermeneutics today but also, and especially, how the crucial gesture of hermeneutics is that of changing the subject for the sake of our today. Surveying briefly the main lines of hermeneutical positions along its history and critiques, and connecting these critiques to the discrepancy between theory and practice, between interpretation and the need to change the world, the article proposes that our reality today, reshaped through globalization and the virtual, is performed as a hermeneutics of history. The challenge for today’s hermeneutics is to work out categories for understanding the present as on-going in a world that tends to capture and distort more and more the meaning of freedom of thought. In the final section, I propose a hermeneutics of the on-going, of gerundive time, partially under the inspiration of Paul Celan, as a response that develops the meaning of the freedom of thought. A defense of nearness and how to think in narrow nearness to the on-going is discussed.

在这篇文章中，我不仅论证了今天解释学的价值，而且，尤其是，解释学的关键姿态是如何为我们的今天改变主题。这篇文章简要回顾了历史和批评中解释学立场的主要路线，并将这些批评与理论与实践之间、解释与改变世界的需要之间的差异联系起来，文章提出，我们今天的现实是通过全球化和虚拟化而重塑的。 , 是作为历史的诠释学而进行的。当今诠释学面临的挑战是制定类别，以将当下理解为在一个越来越倾向于捕捉和扭曲思想自由的含义的世界中正在进行的世界。在最后一节中，我提出了一种关于持续的、起源时间的解释学，部分在保罗策兰的启发下，作为发展思想自由意义的回应。讨论了对亲近的辩护以及如何在狭隘的亲近中思考正在进行的事情。