当前位置: X-MOL 学术Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Remote Work as a Reasonable Accommodation: Implications from the COVID-19 Pandemic
Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review Pub Date : 2021-11-04
Kate Strickland

In Moncrief v. ISS Facility Services, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) argues that ISS Facility Services’ denial of an employee’s reasonable accommodation request to work remotely part-time violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). Filed on September 7, 2021, Moncrief marks the EEOC’s first ever lawsuit claiming an employer violated the ADA by failing to provide accommodations related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

中文翻译:

远程工作是一种合理的住宿方式:COVID-19 大流行的影响

在 Moncrief 诉 ISS Facility Services 案中,平等就业机会委员会 (“EEOC”) 辩称,ISS Facility Services 拒绝员工远程兼职工作的合理便利请求违反了《美国残疾人法》(“ADA”)。Moncrief 于 2021 年 9 月 7 日提起,标志着 EEOC 有史以来第一起诉讼,指控雇主未能提供与 COVID-19 大流行相关的住宿,从而违反了 ADA。
更新日期:2021-11-04
down
wechat
bug