In O.D. and Others v INPS (C-350/20), the Court dealt with the refusal of the Italian authorities to grant childbirth and maternity allowances to third-country nationals falling within the scope of the Single Permit Directive. In CG (C-709/20), the Court considered the refusal of the UK authorities to grant social assistance to an economically inactive EU citizen resident under the UK scheme adopted in the context of Brexit. In AB v Olympiako (C-511/19), the Court found that the Greek legislation, adopted in the context of the economic crisis, placing public sector workers in a labour reserve system is not discriminatory on grounds of age. In WABE and MH Müller Handel (C-804/18 and C-341/19), the Court clarified what circumstances could justify differential treatment indirectly based on religion or belief. The Court confirmed the direct effect of the principle of equal pay for male and female workers enshrined in Article 157 TFEU for cases of work of equal value in Tesco Stores (C-624/19). In Team Power Europe (C-784/19), the Court specified under which criteria a temporary-work agency could be considered as pursuing ‘substantial activities’ in a Member State. In A (C-535/19), the Court held that a Member State cannot exclude an economically inactive EU citizen from its public sickness insurance system but does not have to grant access free of charge. In FORMAT (C-879/19), the Court confirmed that Article 14(2) of Regulation 1408/71 does not apply to a person who, under a single employment contract concluded with a single employer, works in several Member States for more than 12 months in each of those Member States. Finally, in PF (C-27/20), the Court dealt a national legislation which uses the penultimate year preceding the payment period as the reference year for the calculation of family allowances to be allocated.

在OD and Others v INPS (C-350/20) 一案中，法院处理了意大利当局拒绝向属于单一许可指令范围内的第三国国民提供分娩和生育津贴的问题。在CG (C-709/20) 中，法院考虑了英国当局拒绝根据英国退欧背景下采用的英国计划向经济不活跃的欧盟公民居民提供社会援助。在AB v Olympiako (C-511/19) 一案中，法院认定，在经济危机背景下通过的希腊立法将公共部门工人置于劳动力储备体系中，并没有因年龄而存在歧视。在WABE 和 MH Müller Handel(C-804/18 和 C-341/19)，法院澄清了哪些情况可以证明间接基于宗教或信仰的差别待遇是正当的。法院确认了 TFEU 第 157 条规定的男女同工同酬原则对Tesco 商店中同等价值工作案件的直接影响(C-624/19)。在Team Power Europe (C-784/19) 案中，法院具体说明了根据哪些标准可以将临时工作机构视为在成员国从事“实质性活动”。在A (C-535/19) 中，法院认为，成员国不能将经济上不活跃的欧盟公民排除在其公共疾病保险系统之外，但不必免费授予访问权限。在FORMAT(C-879/19)，法院确认，第 1408/71 号条例第 14(2) 条不适用于根据与单一雇主签订的单一雇佣合同在多个成员国工作超过 12 年的人。在这些会员国中的每一个。最后，在PF (C-27/20) 中，法院处理了一项国家立法，该立法使用付款期之前的倒数第二年作为计算要分配的家庭津贴的基准年。