In [1], the following error was published on page 10.

Independent Variables

Confirmatory factor analysis supported the formation of these measures (SRMR = 0.037; RMSEA = 0.046; CFI = 0.984; TLI = 0.954).

The text was incorrect and should have read:

Independent Variables

Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a modest goodness of fit that is typical of the five-factor model based on the MFQ (Harper and Rhodes, 2021; Iurino and Saucier, 2020): SRMR = 0.070; RMSEA = 0.094; CFI = 0.842; TLI = 0.807.

This is supported by the following references:

Harper, Craig A., and Darren Rhodes. 2021. "Reanalysing the factor structure of the moral foundations questionnaire." British Journal of Social Psychology, advance online publication.

Iurino, Kathryn, and Gerard Saucier. 2020. "Testing measurement invariance of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire across 27 countries." Assessment 27(2): 365-372.

The author apologizes for this error.

REFERENCE

Silver, Jasmine R. 2017. “Moral Foundations, Intuitions of Justice, and the Intricacies of Punitive Sentiment.” Law & Society Review 51(2): 413-450. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12264.

在 [1] 中，第 10 页上发布了以下错误。

自变量

验证性因素分析支持这些措施的形成（SRMR = 0.037；RMSEA = 0.046；CFI = 0.984；TLI = 0.954）。

文本不正确，应该是：

自变量

验证性因子分析表明拟合优度适中，这是基于 MFQ 的五因子模型的典型特征（Harper 和 Rhodes，2021；Iurino 和 Saucier，2020）：SRMR = 0.070；RMSEA = 0.094；CFI = 0.842；TLI = 0.807。

以下参考资料支持这一点：

哈珀、克雷格 A. 和达伦罗德。2021.“重新分析道德基础问卷的因素结构”。英国社会心理学杂志，提前在线出版。

尤里诺、凯瑟琳和杰拉德·索西尔。2020.“在 27 个国家/地区测试道德基础问卷的测量不变性”。评估 27(2)：365-372。

作者对此错误深表歉意。

参考

Silver, Jasmine R. 2017。“道德基础、正义直觉和惩罚情绪的复杂性”。法律与社会评论51(2): 413-450。https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12264。