The nature and the social context of Instruction were often discussed in the scholarship. Its relatively high number of copies that have been found in Qumran, and a series of shared literary, linguistic and ideological similarities to compositions often closely associated with the Qumran movement led scholars to debate the attribution of Instruction to this group of texts. This paper argues that the pericope in 4Q418 frg. 81, which uses extensively priestly language and metaphors, reflects similar social context and structure as the Community Rule, and therefore Instruction should be placed among the writings of the community. I will use two-stage analysis of the pericope, which will offer insight on the identity of the addressee, and try to bring some fresh insights on the literary unity of the composition.

教学的性质和社会背景经常在奖学金中讨论。它在昆兰发现的副本数量相对较多，以及与通常与昆兰运动密切相关的作品在文学、语言和意识形态方面的一系列共同之处，导致学者们就教学对这组文本的归属进行了辩论。本文认为 4Q418 frg 的 pericope。81 广泛使用教士的语言和隐喻，反映了与社区规则相似的社会背景和结构，因此应将指令放在社区的著作中。我将使用两阶段的pericope分析，这将提供对收件人身份的洞察力，并尝试为作品的文学统一性带来一些新的见解。