This article takes Judith T. Irvine’s insights about the indeterminacy of participant roles and interpretive frameworks to explore how the increased use of social media in journalism leads to new quandaries for political actors. The dialogics of distributing or amalgamating participant roles provide for a particularly tricky domain of maneuver for journalists in India and Israel, where rightwing leaders seek to control news that disseminates rapidly on the currents of social media. Journalists have long sought to avoid becoming the story themselves, as part of claiming liberal positions that distinguish the reported events from their representation. It considers the current attempt to clamp-down on social media use by journalists as a securitization of communication, where the very journalistic utterance is used by ruling politicians to make the journalist, or potentially the news media more generally, into a threat to public security. However, even such policing can be too slow. This article thus also considers how outraged publics become an important aspect of policing social media.

中文翻译：

---

将传播证券化：论在线新闻中参与者角色的不确定性

本文采用 Judith T. Irvine 关于参与者角色和解释框架的不确定性的见解，探讨社交媒体在新闻业中的使用增加如何导致政治参与者陷入新的困境。分配或合并参与者角色的对话为印度和以色列的记者提供了一个特别棘手的机动领域，右翼领导人试图控制在社交媒体上迅速传播的新闻。长期以来，记者一直试图避免自己成为故事，作为声称将报道的事件与其代表区分开来的自由主义立场的一部分。它认为，目前打击记者使用社交媒体的尝试是一种交流的证券化，执政的政治家使用新闻言论来使记者或可能更普遍的新闻媒体成为对公共安全的威胁。然而，即使是这样的监管也可能太慢了。因此，本文还考虑了愤怒的公众如何成为监管社交媒体的一个重要方面。