This article examines the role, status and perceptions of the Serbian cultural heritage in Kosovo from both Kosovo Albanian and Serbian perspectives. The analysis focuses on two cases, which attracted particular resistance on each of the two sides: the passing of legislation in the Kosovar parliament in 2012 that aimed to protect Serbian cultural heritage and the 2015 unsuccessful Kosovo bid for unesco membership. Both moments demonstrate how cultural heritage is primarily approached from the statehood perspective and used to additionally deepen inter-ethnic distances. The authors shed more light on the discrepancies between the international peacebuilding efforts and the internationally imposed legal framework, challenging the reduction of the peacebuilding efforts to institutional design, while dominant discourses of both Serbian and Albanian elites essentially deepen the enmity and serve as resistance mechanisms to the international peacebuilding strategies.

本文从科索沃阿尔巴尼亚人和塞尔维亚人的角度考察了塞尔维亚文化遗产在科索沃的作用、地位和看法。分析侧重于两个案例，这两个案例都引起了双方的特别抵制：2012 年科索沃议会通过了旨在保护塞尔维亚文化遗产的立法，以及 2015 年科索沃竞标联合国教科文组织未果。会员资格。这两个时刻都展示了文化遗产是如何主要从国家的角度来处理的，并被用来进一步加深种族间的距离。作者更多地阐明了国际建设和平努力与国际强加的法律框架之间的差异，挑战将建设和平努力减少到制度设计，而塞尔维亚和阿尔巴尼亚精英的主导话语本质上加深了敌意，并作为抵制机制国际建设和平战略。