In this essay, I reflect on my experience at the 2015 Society for the Study of Emerging Adulthood (SSEA) Conference to highlight how communication at academic conferences may negatively influence (emotion graft) out-group or minority participants. In this paper, I will discuss the following topics: (a) the acute implicit bias made explicit in Dr. Manago's response to my mention of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement while chairing a session at the 2015 SSEA Conference, (b) the emotion-grafting effect her response had on me and potentially other minority scholars, (c) how her biased response led to missed opportunities for SSEA to be inclusive and innovative while increasing membership and revenue, and (d) the current state of the global response to the BLM movement.

中文翻译：

---

急性内隐偏见和情感嫁接：黑人生活问题运动和新兴成年研究协会，2015 年会议，佛罗里达州迈阿密

在这篇文章中，我回顾了我在 2015 年新兴成人研究协会 (SSEA) 会议上的经历，以强调学术会议上的交流如何对（情感移植）外群体或少数群体参与者产生负面影响。在本文中，我将讨论以下主题：（a）Manago 博士在我主持 2015 年 SSEA 会议时提到的黑人生命问题（BLM）运动的回应中明确表达了尖锐的隐性偏见，（b）她的回应对我和其他少数族裔学者的情感嫁接效应，(c) 她的偏见回应如何导致 SSEA 在增加会员资格和收入的同时错失包容和创新的机会，以及 (d) 全球的现状对 BLM 运动的回应。