The term anaphor–agreement effect refers to the descriptive generalization that anaphors cannot control agreement on the verb. The general consensus in the literature is that the anaphor–agreement effect is a universal phenomenon. Contrary to that consensus, in this article, I present data from a set of languages where an anaphor does indeed control agreement on the verb, in violation of the anaphor–agreement effect. To explain this dual nature of anaphors in the world's languages, I propose a derivational-timing analysis that derives not only the anaphor–agreement effect but also those problematic cases in which it seems to be violated.

中文翻译：

---

推导出照应协议效应及其违反

照应-协议效应一词是指照应不能控制动词协议的描述性概括。文献中的普遍共识是照应协议效应是一种普遍现象。与该共识相反，在本文中，我提供了来自一组语言的数据，其中照应确实控制了动词的一致性，违反了照应-协议效应。为了解释世界语言中照应词的这种双重性质，我提出了一种派生时序分析，该分析不仅可以得出照应词-一致效应，还可以得出似乎违反了照应词的那些有问题的情况。