In this article, I examine John Goldberg and Benjamin Zipursky’s argument, set out in Recognizing Wrongs, that the ‘principle of civil recourse’ explains much (though not all) of tort law. Specifically, I assess their claim that tort remedies are instances of civil recourse. I argue that while this label fits a variety of damages awards (and fits them better than the leading alternatives), it does not fit two significant tort remedies: injunctions and damages for pecuniary losses.

中文翻译：

---

侵权救济是“民事追索权”吗？

在本文中，我研究了 John Goldberg 和 Benjamin Zipursky 在《认识错误》中提出的论点，即“民事追索原则”解释了侵权法的大部分（尽管不是全部）。具体来说，我评估了他们关于侵权救济是民事追索的主张。我认为，虽然这个标签适用于各种损害赔偿裁决（并且比领先的替代方案更适合它们），但它并不适用于两种重要的侵权补救措施：禁令和金钱损失赔偿。