当前位置: X-MOL 学术Feminism & Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Prejudice in ‘inclusive’ spaces: Cisgenderist collusion in the interview context
Feminism & Psychology ( IF 5.833 ) Pub Date : 2022-01-31 , DOI: 10.1177/09593535211063263
Gabriel Knott-Fayle 1 , Elizabeth Peel 1 , Gemma L. Witcomb 1
Affiliation  

Feminist reflexivity aims to (re)consider and challenge power differentials that exist in the research process. This activity is well represented in, for example, research into heterosexism. In this article we expand feminist reflexive practice in relation to cisgenderism through a (re)examination of interview transcripts conducted by a cisgender researcher on the topic of cisgenderism in media representations of trans and intersex sportspeople. Drawing on interviews with 18 cisgender and trans and non-binary participants, we analyse three forms of researcher collusion in cisgenderism, namely: 1) perpetuating cisgenderism in the selection of media materials; 2) assuming trans women are the referent; and 3) disunifying assumptions about trans sportspeople. This reflexive analysis is discussed with regard to how analytical insights can be generated into the operation and functioning of prejudice. In so doing, we further the conception of prejudice as a ubiquitous and latent activity in research practices.



中文翻译:

“包容性”空间中的偏见:采访背景下的顺性别勾结

女权主义反思旨在(重新)考虑和挑战研究过程中存在的权力差异。例如,这项活动在异性恋研究中得到了很好的体现。在本文中,我们通过(重新)检查一名顺性别研究人员就跨性别和双性运动员的媒体表现中的顺性别主义主题进行的采访记录,扩展了与顺性别主义相关的女权主义反思实践。通过对 18 名顺性别、跨性别和非二元参与者的采访,我们分析了三种形式的研究人员勾结在顺性别主义中,即:1)在选择媒体材料时延续顺性别主义;2)假设跨性别女性是参照物;3) 打破对跨性别运动员的假设。这种反思性分析讨论了如何对偏见的运作和运作产生分析见解。通过这样做,我们进一步将偏见视为研究实践中普遍存在的潜在活动的概念。

更新日期:2022-01-31
down
wechat
bug