In the late 2021, the European Court of Human Rights rejected as inadmissible the application lodged by a person affiliated with the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. The Court argued that ‘Pastafarianism’, due to its purely satirical character, cannot be considered to be a religion or belief within the sense of Article 9 of the European Convention of Human Rights. This ruling appears to be convincingly justified. However, some aspects of the reasoning offered in the body of the decision might raise concerns as to the Court’s willingness to adhere to its earlier standards, since the conclusion was reached at the price of overstretching the well-established view on the incompatibility of the state’s duty of neutrality with any power to assess the legitimacy of religious beliefs or the ways in which they are expressed.

中文翻译：

---

毕竟，意大利面食人在斯特拉斯堡输了？

2021 年底，欧洲人权法院以不可受理为由驳回了一名隶属于飞行意大利面怪物教堂的人提出的申请。法院认为，“Pastafarianism”由于其纯粹的讽刺性质，不能被视为《欧洲人权公约》第 9 条意义上的宗教或信仰。这一裁决似乎是有说服力的。但是，该决定正文中提供的推理的某些方面可能会引起人们对法院是否愿意遵守其早期标准的担忧，因为得出该结论的代价是过度夸大了关于国家法律不相容的既定观点。有任何权力评估宗教信仰的合法性或表达方式的中立义务。