During talk, parliamentarians (re)negotiate the boundaries of mainstream and marginal politics. With far-right parties in parliament(s) in force, center-right parties—especially those that have coopted far-right stances—must establish and maintain their position within the political mainstream, while ostracizing and marginalizing neighboring positions from the far-right. Drawing on video data of policy debates in the German Bundestag, this paper takes a conversation analytic approach to examining practices deployed by members of mainstream parties for rejecting proposals made by the far-right. It shows ways center-right politicians (re)produce both the mainstream and their own political identity by rejecting such proposals without also rejecting outright the underlying stance. By distinguishing between oppositional and proximate stancetaking, this analysis further demonstrates ways that politicians orient to stancetaking as structuring rejection formats.

中文翻译：

---

谈判主流：联邦议院辩论中的近似立场和极右翼政策建议

在谈话中，议员们（重新）协商主流政治和边缘政治的界限。随着议会中极右翼政党的生效，中右翼政党——尤其是那些采取极右立场的政党——必须在政治主流中确立并保持其地位，同时排斥和边缘化极右翼的相邻立场. 本文利用德国联邦议院政策辩论的视频数据，采用对话分析的方法来检验主流政党成员拒绝极右翼提案的做法。它展示了中右翼政治家通过拒绝此类提议而不完全拒绝基本立场的方式（重新）生产主流和他们自己的政治身份。通过区分对立的和直接的立场采取，