当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Banking Regulation › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Reassessing bank monitoring models: an empirical analysis of the value of market signals in the period 2008–2020
Journal of Banking Regulation Pub Date : 2022-03-25 , DOI: 10.1057/s41261-022-00194-4
Tânia Costa 1 , Júlio Lobão 2 , Luís Pacheco 3
Affiliation  

One of the major goals of bank supervisors is to predict bank distress events. As the environment changes, it is crucial to reassess and improve the models used in monitoring banks. The financial soundness of banks is traditionally assessed based on accounting ratios. However, the incorporation of market information in these models may significantly improve its ability to predict bank distress. The present paper has two main objectives, the first is to assess if market information adds value to accounting-based monitoring models when the purpose is to detect bank distress situations. Further, it also seeks to understand if the predictive power of market signals increased with transparency requirements. To accomplish this purpose, a total of 81 distress events from a sample of 248 European banks between 2008 and 2020 were analyzed. First, a logit univariate analysis was used to evaluate the relevance of each accounting and market variable. Then, the optimal multivariate accounting-based model to predict distress events was constructed using a stepwise approach. Finally, the previous model was extended to include the relevant market variables. The results support the use of market variables in bank monitoring models. Further, the present study provides evidence that the predictive power of market variables increased after the strengthening of the information requirements set by the Basel agreements. It can be concluded that the results support the use of market information for banking supervisory purposes, especially, in transparent markets.



中文翻译:

重新评估银行监控模型:对 2008-2020 年期间市场信号价值的实证分析

银行监管者的主要目标之一是预测银行困境事件。随着环境的变化,重新评估和改进用于监控银行的模型至关重要。传统上,银行的财务稳健性是根据会计比率来评估的。然而,将市场信息纳入这些模型可能会显着提高其预测银行困境的能力。本文有两个主要目标,首先是评估市场信息是否为基于会计的监控模型增加了价值,目的是检测银行陷入困境的情况。此外,它还试图了解市场信号的预测能力是否随着透明度要求而增加。为实现这一目标,我们分析了 2008 年至 2020 年间来自 248 家欧洲银行样本的总共 81 起遇险事件。第一的,使用 logit 单变量分析来评估每个会计和市场变量的相关性。然后,使用逐步方法构建了预测遇险事件的最佳多元会计模型。最后,将之前的模型扩展到包括相关的市场变量。结果支持在银行监控模型中使用市场变量。此外,本研究提供的证据表明,在加强巴塞尔协议规定的信息要求后,市场变量的预测能力有所提高。可以得出结论,结果支持将市场信息用于银行监管目的,尤其是在透明市场中。使用逐步方法构建了预测遇险事件的最佳多元会计模型。最后,将之前的模型扩展到包括相关的市场变量。结果支持在银行监控模型中使用市场变量。此外,本研究提供的证据表明,在加强巴塞尔协议规定的信息要求后,市场变量的预测能力有所提高。可以得出结论,结果支持将市场信息用于银行监管目的,尤其是在透明市场中。使用逐步方法构建了预测遇险事件的最佳多元会计模型。最后,将之前的模型扩展到包括相关的市场变量。结果支持在银行监控模型中使用市场变量。此外,本研究提供的证据表明,在加强巴塞尔协议规定的信息要求后,市场变量的预测能力有所提高。可以得出结论,结果支持将市场信息用于银行监管目的,尤其是在透明市场中。本研究提供的证据表明,在加强巴塞尔协议规定的信息要求后,市场变量的预测能力有所提高。可以得出结论,结果支持将市场信息用于银行监管目的,尤其是在透明市场中。本研究提供的证据表明,在加强巴塞尔协议规定的信息要求后,市场变量的预测能力有所提高。可以得出结论,结果支持将市场信息用于银行监管目的,尤其是在透明市场中。

更新日期:2022-03-25
down
wechat
bug