In recent decades, empirical study of experience has been installed as a relevant and necessary element in researching cognitive phenomena. However, its incorporation into cognitive science has been largely done by following an objectivist frame of reference, without reconsidering the practices and standards involved in the process of research and the interpretation and validation of the results. This has given rise to a number of issues that reveal inconsistencies in the understanding and treatment of some crucial aspects of first-person research. In this article, we will outline a research direction aiming at contributing to the establishment of a framework for the study of experience that addresses these inconsistencies. Specifically, we will identify some challenges facing the study of experience—in particular those linked to the understanding of memory, expression and description, and intersubjectivity in exploring experience—and propose to reframe them under the epistemological framework of the enactive approach. Moreover, we will explore the prospect of gaining insight into theoretical and methodological strategies for dealing with these issues by extending our vision beyond the field of cognitive science to its neighboring fields, focusing in particular on the field of somatic practices.

近几十年来，经验的实证研究已成为研究认知现象的相关且必要的元素。然而，将其纳入认知科学在很大程度上是通过遵循客观主义的参考框架来完成的，而没有重新考虑研究过程以及结果的解释和验证所涉及的实践和标准。这引发了许多问题，这些问题揭示了对第一人称研究的某些关键方面的理解和处理不一致。在本文中，我们将概述一个研究方向，旨在帮助建立一个解决这些不一致的经验研究框架。具体来说，我们将确定体验研究面临的一些挑战——特别是与理解记忆、表达和描述以及探索体验中的主体间性相关的挑战——并建议在生成方法的认识论框架下重新构建它们。此外，我们将通过将我们的视野从认知科学领域扩展到其邻近领域，特别是关注躯体实践领域，探索深入了解处理这些问题的理论和方法策略的前景。