This article examines Fanon’s reasoning on the inevitability of using violence for both antagonistic projects of colonialism and decolonization. Based on Fanon’s political thought, the article explores how the mono-concept of violence is interpreted differently. Such a lack of harmony in the interpretation of the concept of violence has called this article to be undertaken for an examination of Fanon’s conception of violence, hence he reveals that the use of violence is unavoidable for both colonialism and (genuine) decolonization. In that perspective, Fanon shows how since the first launch of the conquest, colonizers had to arbitrarily use violence, the same violence that is still characterizing the long-lasting project of colonialism. Likewise, for the realization of full decolonization, Fanon’s concern is that the colonized subjects have to launch back the same accumulated violence, for them to travel to a new world—a world lived by new human beings who are genuinely decolonized.

本文考察了法农关于为对抗殖民主义和非殖民化项目使用暴力的必然性的推理。本文以法农的政治思想为基础，探讨了如何对单一的暴力概念进行不同的解释。对暴力概念的解释如此不协调，因此本文需要对法农的暴力概念进行检验，因此他揭示了使用暴力对于殖民主义和（真正的）非殖民化都是不可避免的。从这个角度来看，法农展示了自从第一次征服开始以来，殖民者如何不得不任意使用暴力，同样的暴力仍然是殖民主义长期项目的特征。同样，为了实现全面非殖民化，