Commissioning agencies and social impact bonds are two examples of New Zealand’s shift towards payment-for-outcomes funding mechanisms over the last decade, as the government attempted to improve both policy innovation and social outcomes. This article highlights that although the commissioning agencies have been more successful than social impact bonds, neither has completely achieved these goals of innovation and improved outcomes. This is particularly concerning given Indigenous Māori are disproportionately impacted by both policies. Discussion concludes by highlighting some of the problems associated with applying a payment-for-outcomes model to Indigenous Peoples, given these funding mechanisms are becoming increasingly popular in other settler nation states.

中文翻译：

---

按结果付费的模式会改善原住民的福祉吗？新西兰的委托机构和社会影响债券

委托机构和社会影响债券是新西兰在过去十年中转向按结果付费的融资机制的两个例子，因为政府试图改善政策创新和社会成果。本文强调，尽管委托机构比社会影响债券更成功，但两者都没有完全实现这些创新和改善成果的目标。这尤其令人担忧，因为原住民毛利人受到这两项政策的不成比例的影响。讨论最后强调了将结果付费模式应用于土著人民的一些问题，因为这些资助机制在其他定居民族国家越来越受欢迎。