Populists in Southeast Asia generally refrain from invoking anti-migrant and anti-minority sentiments as part of their mobilizational strategies. This differentiates them from "exclusionary" populists in Europe, even though many Southeast Asian countries are diverse societies with long histories of migration and ethnic chauvinism. Because the categories of peoplehood that were set alongside the onset of mass politics at independence remain salient today, they constrain contemporary Asian populists' rhetorical and mobilizational strategies—even in Southeast Asia's diverse societies. The Southeast Asian experience reveals the importance of historical sequence in nationalist mobilization and mass incorporation in shaping popular identity, citizenship, and membership in contemporary populism.

中文翻译：

---

东南亚的移民、少数族裔和民粹主义 Thomas Pepinsky

东南亚的民粹主义者一般不会将反移民和反少数群体情绪作为其动员战略的一部分。这将他们与欧洲的“排外”民粹主义者区分开来，尽管许多东南亚国家是多元社会，有着悠久的移民和种族沙文主义历史。由于独立时群众政治的兴起而设置的民族类别在今天仍然很突出，它们限制了当代亚洲民粹主义者的修辞和动员策略——即使在东南亚的多元化社会中也是如此。东南亚的经验揭示了历史顺序在民族主义动员和大众融合中对塑造当代民粹主义的大众身份、公民身份和成员资格的重要性。