This paper discusses some central problems that occur within cognitive versification studies. Derek Attridge’s Moving Words (2013) comments on Richard Cureton’s concept of temporalities. Attridge understands poetic rhythm as movement. He draws the conclusion that movement and repetition are, in principle, contradictory because, in a way, repetition looks backwards and stops the movement. This turns out to be a complicated statement, as repetition seems to be the only poetic device that is common in poetry all over the world. However, it may be possible to understand the relationship between movement and repetition with the help of Reuven Tsur’s concept of back-structuring. This shows how verse rhythm is spatialised as well as has the ability to move in time. This is possible because of gestalt borders that close the sequences. Additionally, Cureton’s fourth thematic temporality is useful to solve the conflict. Temporality is a complex reality, and poetic rhythm also has the ability to stand still.

中文翻译：

---

运动和平衡。对德里克·阿特里奇的动人词的评论

本文讨论了认知验证研究中出现的一些核心问题。Derek Attridge 的Moving Words (2013) 评论了Richard Cureton 的时间概念。Attridge 将诗意的节奏理解为运动。他得出的结论是，运动和重复原则上是矛盾的，因为在某种程度上，重复会向后看并停止运动。事实证明这是一个复杂的陈述，因为重复似乎是全世界诗歌中唯一常见的诗歌手段。然而，借助 Reuven Tsur 的反向结构概念，或许可以理解运动和重复之间的关系。这显示了诗歌节奏是如何被空间化的，并且具有随时间移动的能力。这是可能的，因为格式塔边界关闭了序列。此外，Cureton 的第四个主题时间性对于解决冲突很有用。时间性是复杂的现实，诗意的韵律也有静止的能力。