This article reviews three models of Democratic Economic Planning, those of Pat Devine and Fikret Adaman, Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel, and Paul Cockshott and Allin Cottrell. Part of a larger research project aiming to merge certain features of these models, this article proposes five criteria to evaluate them. Following a proposal made by David Laibman, it adopts the organization and regulation criteria and add three others to them: limitation, formalization, and scope. Finally, the article offers a brief analysis of the models from those criteria.

JEL Classification: P20, P51, B51

中文翻译：

---

评估民主经济计划模式的五个标准

本文回顾了民主经济计划的三种模型，即 Pat Devine 和 Fikret Adaman、Michael Albert 和 Robin Hahnel 以及 Paul Cockshott 和 Allin Cottrell 的模型。作为旨在合并这些模型的某些特征的大型研究项目的一部分，本文提出了五个标准来评估它们。根据 David Laibman 的提议，它采用了组织和监管标准，并在其中增加了三个其他标准：限制、形式化和范围。最后，本文根据这些标准对模型进行了简要分析。

JEL分类： P20、P51、B51