In what way can coregulation and regulation (like that included in the NetzDG and envisaged by the Digital Services Act) ensure individual users' right to procedural fairness, through ensuring due process and transparency? In other words, how could users be treated fairly when it comes to removing their objectionable content: For example, by being appropriately informed, being able to raise complaints against removal of their content, and by being able to challenge the platform's decision? The current state of the play is to push the responsibility of deciding about questions related to freedom of expression on social media platform providers. In the triangle of freedom of expression social media platforms enjoy a disproportionate power to the detriment of the other two actors: authorities and individuals. This article takes note about how platforms act as proxies for state authority in content governance and examines how procedural fairness could ensure a safety zone to protect freedom of expression.

中文翻译：

---

平台监管中作为人权保障的程序性权利

通过确保正当程序和透明度，共同监管和监管（如 NetzDG 中包含的和数字服务法所设想的）可以以何种方式确保个人用户享有程序公平的权利？换句话说，在删除令人反感的内容时，如何公平对待用户：例如，通过适当的通知、能够针对删除他们的内容提出投诉，以及能够质疑平台的决定？该剧的当前状态是将决定与社交媒体平台提供商的言论自由相关问题的责任推上去。在言论自由的三角关系中，社交媒体平台享有不成比例的权力，损害了其他两个参与者：当局和个人。