当前位置: X-MOL 学术Signs › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Antifeminism, Profeminism, and the Myth of White Men’s Disadvantage
Signs ( IF 2.614 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-01 , DOI: 10.1086/712076
Tristan Bridges

This article analyzes how members of antifeminist and profeminist men’s groups discursively situate themselves as stigmatized by privilege. While the antifeminist men engage in symbolic disclosures that locate (white) men as the “real victims” of gender inequality, the profeminist men rely on strategies of disidentification to symbolically position themselves as somehow outside of the relations of gender and racial power and privilege they organize to oppose. Both of these power-evasive strategies sustain hybrid hegemonic masculinity while responding to a predicament that some young, white, heterosexual men encounter. Faced with their association with the increasing visibility of privilege and systems of socially structured advantage, they develop discourses that sustain a denial of their structural positions of power. Both groups’ strategies work to secure and obscure their institutionalized power by projecting atavistic masculinity onto other, marginalized, and subordinated groups of men and performances of masculinity, rendering gender and racial subordination less visible.

中文翻译:

反女权主义、女权主义和白人男性劣势的神话

本文分析了反女权主义和女权主义男性团体的成员如何将自己置于被特权污名化的地位。反女权主义者进行象征性披露,将(白人)男性定位为性别不平等的“真正受害者”,而女权主义者则依靠消除身份的策略将自己象征性地置于性别和种族权力关系之外,并赋予他们特权。组织反对。这两种权力规避策略都维持了混合霸权的男子气概,同时应对了一些年轻的白人异性恋男性遇到的困境。面对他们与特权和社会结构优势系统的日益可见的联系,他们发展了维持否认其结构性权力地位的话语。
更新日期:2021-03-01
down
wechat
bug