This essay theorizes the work of rage at the interface of trans and feminist theories and movements. The juncture of trans and feminist movements is in need of continuing attention given the contemporary resurgence of trans-exclusionary forms of feminist thought and praxis and the ongoing phenomenon of a form of feminist trans tolerance that often falls short of substantive inclusion. I theorize the intersection of trans and feminist movements as a site of affective dissonance and failed care by exploring the multivalent operations of rage within attempts at trans-feminist coalitional politics. I examine how rage can be both world building and world destroying for subjects and collectives, how rage is or isn’t made legible, how (il)legibility informs both whose rage matters and what rage is able to do, and how rage becomes involuted as a form of political depression when the spaces that are meant to empathically hold and witness the range of negative affects associated with oppression fail to do so. Ultimately, the essay is animated by one central question: What roles does rage play in the difficult (and imperative) cultivation of transfeminist coalitions?

中文翻译：

---

修复的承诺：跨性别的愤怒和女权主义联盟的局限

这篇文章对跨性别和女权主义理论和运动的接口处的愤怒工作进行了理论化。鉴于当代女权主义思想和实践的跨性别排斥形式的复苏，以及一种经常缺乏实质性包容的女权跨性别容忍形式的持续现象，跨性别和女权主义运动的结合点需要继续关注。我通过探索跨女权联盟政治尝试中愤怒的多价运作，将跨性别和女权运动的交集理论化为情感失调和失败的关怀的场所。我研究了对于主体和集体来说，愤怒如何既可以建立世界，也可以破坏世界，愤怒如何变得清晰或不清晰，（不）易读性如何告知谁的愤怒很重要以及愤怒能够做什么，以及当旨在以移情方式容纳和见证与压迫相关的一系列负面影响的空间未能这样做时，愤怒如何成为一种政治抑郁形式。最终，这篇文章被一个核心问题所激发：愤怒在跨女性联盟的艰难（和必要）培养中扮演什么角色？