While it is encouraging to see renewed attention to 'openness' in academia, that debate (and its interpretation of the F.A.I.R. principles) is often rather narrowly defined. This paper addresses openness in a broad sense, asking not so much whether a project is open, but how open and to whom. I illustrate these ideas through examples of my own ongoing projects which to seek to make the most of a potential symbiosis between academic and wider musical communities. Specifically, I discuss how these communities can both benefit from – and even work together on building – highly accessible and interoperable corpora of scores and analyses when ambitious openness is factored into decision making from the outset.

中文翻译：

---

点点滴滴：为音乐家和音乐学家的互惠而采取更广泛的开放形式

虽然看到学术界对“开放性”的重新关注令人鼓舞，但这种辩论（及其对 FAIR 原则的解释）的定义通常相当狭窄。本文从广义上讨论开放性，而不是一个项目是否开放，而是如何开放以及对谁开放。我通过我自己正在进行的项目的例子来说明这些想法，这些项目旨在最大限度地利用学术和更广泛的音乐社区之间的潜在共生关系。具体来说，我讨论了当雄心勃勃的开放性从一开始就被纳入决策制定时，这些社区如何既可以受益于——甚至可以共同构建——高度可访问和可互操作的分数和分析语料库。