当前位置: X-MOL 学术Open Philosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Divergences and Convergences of Perspective: Amerindian Perspectivism, Phenomenology, and Speculative Realism
Open Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 , DOI: 10.1515/opphil-2022-0199
Ignas Šatkauskas 1
Affiliation  

Abstract According to Viveiros de Castro, comparison as ontology defines the ontological turn in anthropology. It presents a necessity for philosophy to approach the matter with comparative strategy. Morten Pedersen claims that ontological turn should be interpreted as a fulfillment of an anthropological version of Husserl’s method. Thus, phenomenology enters the field of interest along with its critique in Speculative Realism. In this article, we will see clearly why this selection is not accidental but rather unavoidable. Amerindian perspectivism necessitates the philosophical reconceptualization of perspective in general, which is to be taken as a challenge for the established discourses. The need arises to rethink the problematic of Kantian perspectivism and its offspring. Amerindian perspectivism proposes cosmological deictics that hold a spatiality of the perspective of the other, of the in-itself, thus it comes into an opposition to Kant’s system. Phenomenological perspective, as one of the Kantian offspring, faces a predicament that is interwoven with the critique of correlationism arriving from Speculative Realisms. The synthetic character of phenomenology allows enough flexibility for it to traverse these recent charges. We will draw a comparative picture of dynamic co-evolution of strains of recent thought, striving for a synthetic multiplicity, permeated by a common perspectival thread.

中文翻译:

视角的分歧与趋同:美洲印第安人视角主义、现象学和思辨实在论

摘要 根据 Viveiros de Castro 的观点,作为本体论的比较定义了人类学的本体论转向。它提出了哲学用比较策略来处理这个问题的必要性。Morten Pedersen 声称本体论转向应该被解释为对胡塞尔方法的人类学版本的实现。因此,现象学与它对思辨实在论的批判一起进入了感兴趣的领域。在本文中,我们将清楚地看到为什么这种选择不是偶然的,而是不可避免的。美洲印第安人的透视主义需要对一般的透视进行哲学重新概念化,这将被视为对既定话语的挑战。需要重新思考康德透视主义及其后代的问题。美洲印第安人的透视主义提出了宇宙学指示论,它持有他者视角、自在视角的空间性,因此它与康德的体系形成对立。现象学视角,作为康德派的后代之一,面临着与思辨现实主义对相关主义的批判交织在一起的困境。现象学的综合特征允许它有足够的灵活性来遍历这些最近的指控。我们将绘制一张近期思想的动态共同演化的对比图,力求综合的多样性,并渗透到共同的视角线索中。面临的困境与投机现实主义对相关主义的批评交织在一起。现象学的综合特征允许它有足够的灵活性来遍历这些最近的指控。我们将绘制一张近期思想的动态共同演化的对比图,力求综合的多样性,并渗透在共同的视角线索中。面临的困境与投机现实主义对相关主义的批评交织在一起。现象学的综合特征允许它有足够的灵活性来遍历这些最近的指控。我们将绘制一张近期思想的动态共同演化的对比图,力求综合的多样性,并渗透在共同的视角线索中。
更新日期:2022-01-01
down
wechat
bug