Many scholars argue that democracy tames religious fundamentalism. This inclusion-moderation theory holds that when radical religious movements are incorporated in the democratic system, they have incentives to adhere to institutional frameworks to influence politics and access power. But despite these claims, we have witnessed a growing influence of religious fundamentalism in Asian democratic politics, with immoderation becoming prominent. Why have religious fundamentalist movements become influential in various democracies in Asia? How have they shaped policies? Using a most-different-systems approach, I investigate religious fundamentalism in two dissimilar democracies: Islamic fundamentalism in Indonesia and Christian fundamentalism in South Korea. In both cases, I argue that religious fundamentalist movements facilitate immoderate politics through strong mobilization capacity, agenda-setting power, and framing. The study contributes to the inclusion-moderation literature through its discussion of religious fundamentalism and its cross-religious comparison.

中文翻译：

---

将社会运动纳入包容-适度论文

许多学者认为，民主驯服了宗教原教旨主义。这种包容-缓和理论认为，当激进的宗教运动被纳入民主制度时，他们就有动力坚持制度框架来影响政治和获取权力。但尽管有这些说法，我们目睹了宗教原教旨主义在亚洲民主政治中的影响越来越大，不节制变得突出。为什么宗教原教旨主义运动在亚洲各个民主国家都具有影响力？他们是如何塑造政策的？使用最不同系统的方法，我调查了两个不同民主国家的宗教原教旨主义：印度尼西亚的伊斯兰原教旨主义和韩国的基督教原教旨主义。在这两种情况下，我认为，宗教原教旨主义运动通过强大的动员能力、议程设置能力和框架来促进不节制的政治。该研究通过讨论宗教原教旨主义及其跨宗教比较，为包容温和的文献做出了贡献。