当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Science Communication › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Boundary spanners and thinking partners: adapting and expanding the research-practice partnership literature for public engagement with science (PES)
Journal of Science Communication Pub Date : 2021-11-08 , DOI: 10.22323/2.20070801
Karen Peterman , Sarah Garlick , John Besley , Sue Allen , Kathy Fallon Lambert , Nalini M. Nadkarni , Mark S. Rosin , Caitlin Weber , Marissa Weiss , Jen Wong

This paper is the culmination of several meaning-making activities between an external researcher, PES practitioners, and social scientist researchers who considered the unique contributions that can be made through RPPs on PES (that is, research-practice partnerships on public engagement with science). Based on the experiences from three RPP projects, the group noted that the PES context may be particularly suited to RPPs, and identified the importance of working as thinking-partners who support reciprocal decision-making. Recommendations are made in support of using these approaches to advance practical knowledge-building and reduce shared frustrations about the disconnect between research and practice in PES.

中文翻译:

边界跨越者和思考伙伴:调整和扩展研究-实践伙伴关系文献以促进公众参与科学 (PES)

本文是外部研究人员、PES 从业者和社会科学家研究人员之间的几次意义创造活动的高潮,他们考虑了通过 PES 上的 RPP 可以做出的独特贡献(即公众参与科学的研究-实践伙伴关系) . 根据三个 RPP 项目的经验,该小组指出 PES 环境可能特别适合 RPP,并确定了作为支持互惠决策的思考伙伴工作的重要性。建议支持使用这些方法来推进实践知识建设,并减少对 PES 研究与实践脱节的共同挫败感。
更新日期:2021-11-08
down
wechat
bug