Aim. In academic writing, lack of coherence is thought to occur mostly due to the lack of necessary linguistic skills and knowledge in L2. Thus, the analysis of a written text is concerned with understanding the local relations among the ideas conveyed in a text.Concept. As is usually the case, students writing in a second language generally produce texts that contain varying degrees of grammatical and rhetorical errors. Most of the studies have been conducted with only one criterion for the analysis of coherence and they reported different results. Also, most of them have been conducted on a small scale in terms of the number of participants, and writing samples collected. Therefore, this study tries to investigate the coherence problems/errors of university students in their writing, if any, on a fairly large scale in light of the Cooperative principle and its maxims.Results and conclusion. The study revealed that the basic problem of the students in their essay writing was the way the text should be structured with reference to how cohesion and coherence are established. In the analysis of maxim violations, the violation of the Quality maxim was identified as making overgeneralisations or giving inadequate or no evidence/support for the claims/ideas. The violation of the Quality maxim indicates that students tend to do it due to their linguistic inadequacies.

中文翻译：

---

格赖斯格言下英语学生写作的连贯性问题

目标。在学术写作中，缺乏连贯性被认为主要是由于缺乏必要的第二语言技能和知识。因此，书面文本的分析涉及理解文本中传达的思想之间的局部关系。概念。通常情况下，使用第二语言写作的学生通常会产生包含不同程度的语法和修辞错误的文本。大多数研究只使用一个分析连贯性的标准进行，并且报告了不同的结果。此外，就参与者人数和收集的写作样本而言，大多数都是小规模进行的。因此，本研究试图调查大学生写作中的连贯问题/错误，如果有的话，根据合作原则及其准则，在相当大的范围内进行。结果和结论。研究表明，学生在论文写作中的基本问题是文本的结构方式，以及如何建立连贯性和连贯性。在违反准则的分析中，违反质量准则的行为被确定为过度概括或对主张/想法提供不充分或没有证据/支持。违反质量准则表明学生倾向于这样做是由于他们的语言不足。违反质量准则被确定为过度概括或为主张/想法提供不充分或没有证据/支持。违反质量准则表明学生倾向于这样做是由于他们的语言不足。违反质量准则被确定为过度概括或为主张/想法提供不充分或没有证据/支持。违反质量准则表明学生倾向于这样做是由于他们的语言不足。