当前位置: X-MOL 学术Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The compatibility of running-based anaerobic sprint test and Wingate anaerobic test: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports Pub Date : 2022-04-30 , DOI: 10.15561/26649837.2022.0208
Kuldeep Nara , Parveen Kumar , Rohit Rathee , Jitender Kumar

Background and Study Aim. The objective of the study was to perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis to determine the validity of running-based sprint test in relation to 30 second Wingate anaerobic test. Material and Methods. A search of the relevant literature was done using the key words, ‘running-based anaerobic sprint test’, ‘RAST’, ‘Validity’ ‘repeated sprint’ and ‘Wingate’. Twelve studies including 368 participants were finalized to systematic review and meta-analysis. The mean ± standard deviation of the number of participants was 30.66 ± 16.17 years. Results. The summary of effects size were calculated to established the validity of running based sprint test (RAST) with 30 seconds Wingate test as a criterion measure. All studies indicate that effect size of Peak Power (PP) shows higher summary effects 0.58 (95%CI – 0.37, 0.79), similar outputs were observed for Mean Power (MP) 0.67 (95%CI – 0.45, 0.90). Therefore, the average outcomes were significantly different from zero. Conclusions. Running-based anaerobic sprint test is a valid alternative method of 30 seconds Wingate test to measure anaerobic power outputs of healthy individual belongs to various sports disciplines. Although, anaerobic capacity or power output is a determinant factor in power dominating sports. Therefore, RAST is compatible to laboratory-based Wingate 30 second anaerobic test (WAnT) in field-based settings.

中文翻译:

基于跑步的无氧冲刺测试与温盖特无氧测试的兼容性:系统评价和荟萃分析

背景和研究目的。该研究的目的是对文献和荟萃分析进行系统回顾,以确定基于跑步的冲刺测试与 30 秒温盖特无氧测试的有效性。材料和方法。使用关键词“基于跑步的无氧冲刺测试”、“RAST”、“有效性”、“重复冲刺”和“Wingate”对相关文献进行了检索。包括 368 名参与者在内的 12 项研究最终完成系统评价和荟萃分析。参与者人数的平均值±标准差为 30.66±16.17 年。结果。计算效果大小的汇总以建立基于跑步的冲刺测试 (RAST) 的有效性,其中 30 秒温盖特测试作为标准测量。所有研究表明,峰值功率 (PP) 的效应大小显示出更高的汇总效应 0。58 (95%CI - 0.37, 0.79),对于平均功率 (MP) 0.67 (95%CI - 0.45, 0.90) 观察到类似的输出。因此,平均结果显着不同于零。结论 基于跑步的无氧冲刺测试是30秒温盖特测试的有效替代方法,用于测量健康个体的无氧功率输出,属于各种运动学科。虽然,无氧能力或功率输出是功率主导运动的决定性因素。因此,RAST 与基于实验室的 Wingate 30 秒厌氧测试 (WANT) 在现场环境中兼容。基于跑步的无氧冲刺测试是30秒温盖特测试的有效替代方法,用于测量健康个体的无氧功率输出,属于各种运动学科。虽然,无氧能力或功率输出是功率主导运动的决定性因素。因此,RAST 与基于实验室的 Wingate 30 秒厌氧测试 (WANT) 在现场环境中兼容。基于跑步的无氧冲刺测试是30秒温盖特测试的有效替代方法,用于测量健康个体的无氧功率输出,属于各种运动学科。虽然,无氧能力或功率输出是功率主导运动的决定性因素。因此,RAST 与基于实验室的 Wingate 30 秒厌氧测试 (WANT) 在现场环境中兼容。
更新日期:2022-04-30
down
wechat
bug