当前位置: X-MOL 学术European Journal of Social Security › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Overview of recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (January-march 2022)
European Journal of Social Security Pub Date : 2022-04-25 , DOI: 10.1177/13882627221094059
Pauline Melin 1 , Susanne Sivonennn 1
Affiliation  

In Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld (C-205/20) , the Court of Justice was asked to clarify whether a provision under Directive 2014/67 on the proportionality of penalties in the context of posting of workers has direct effect. In CJ v TGSS (C-389/20), the Spanish social security legislation excluding domestic workers from unemployment benefits was under scrutiny in light of the principle of non-discrimination on grounds of sex enshrined in Directive 79/7. In HR Rail (C-485/20), the Court of Justice interpreted the obligation for employers to provide for ‘reasonable accommodation’ for workers with disabilities, including trainees, under Article 5 of Directive 2000/78. In Koch Personaldienstleistungen GmbH (C-514/20), the Court determined whether for the purposes of calculating working time and overtime pay, account should be taken only of the hours actually worked or also of the hours from annual paid leave. Continuing on the importance of the right to annual leave, the Court ruled, in Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-217/20), on the remuneration of annual leave in situations of permanent incapacity of a worker due to illness. In VB (C-262/20), the Court considered the compatibility of Bulgarian law on the duration of night work for civil servants such as firefighters with Directive 2003/88 and the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Finally, in MIUR et Ufficio Scolastico Regionale per la Campania (C-282/19), the Court assessed whether the systematic use of successive fixed-term contracts for Catholic education teachers in Italy could be justified by ‘objective reasons’ within the meaning of Clause 5(1) of the framework agreement.

中文翻译:

欧盟法院近期审理的案件概览(2022 年 1 月至 2022 年 3 月)

在 Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld (C-205/20) 案中,法院被要求澄清第 2014/67 号指令中关于派遣工人的处罚相称性的规定是否具有直接影响。在 CJ 诉 TGSS (C-389/20) 案中,西班牙的社会保障立法根据第 79/7 号指令所载的不基于性别的歧视原则,将家庭工人排除在失业救济金之外。在 HR Rail (C-485/20) 中,法院解释了雇主根据 2000/78 号指令第 5 条为包括实习生在内的残疾工人提供“合理便利”的义务。在 Koch Personaldienstleistungen GmbH (C-514/20) 案中,法院裁定是否为了计算工作时间和加班费,应该只考虑实际工作的时间或带薪年假的时间。继续关于年假权利的重要性,法院在 Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-217/20) 案中就工人因病永久丧失工作能力的情况下的年假报酬作出裁决。在 VB (C-262/20) 案中,法院考虑了保加利亚关于消防员等公务员夜间工作时间的法律与 2003/88 号指令和《基本权利宪章》的兼容性。最后,在 MIUR et Ufficio Scolastico Regionale per la Campania (C-282/19) 中,法院评估了意大利天主教教育教师系统性使用连续定期合同是否可以通过“客观原因”来证明是合理的。框架协议第 5(1) 条。
更新日期:2022-04-25
down
wechat
bug