they have regarding social policy, but also about understanding how they are organised, how different issues are linked with other topics in their portfolio, and how they combine different world views in order to disseminate ideas. Third, the whole chain of shaping discourses is thus covered, leading to new empirical insights. The first main lesson is the role played by IOs in establishing priorities and structuring different fields. For instance, the second chapter explains their contribution to shaping youth unemployment as an important policy field, with education becoming a cross-cutting issue for many IOs, resulting in a convergence of the discourse. In some other cases, it may go in the other direction. The way the field itself is structured may impact the dynamic evolution of IOs, as with migration and care issues in chapter 4 or the evolution of climate change in chapter 11. The way IOs contribute to establish priorities and disseminate ideas is reflected in the effectiveness of national policies. In chapter 13, the authors show how food security remains a fundamental problem today and assert that IOs are part of the problem, displaying an overly optimistic trust in the markets to solve the issue. The second important lesson is the connection between discourses and the intrinsic features of IOs, also leading to different interactions with other IOs in the same policy field. The ILO and the World Bank, two dominating IOs in the global governance of social policy, are organised very differently. It leads to opposing logics regarding, labour and migration issues (chapter 2) and also supports the continuation of their dominant positions over time. The different intrinsic features of both key players have resulted in different discourses between a social and a neoliberal discourse regarding global labour standards (chapter 3), pensions (chapter 5), family policies between the North and the South (chapter 8) and disability (chapter 9). Overall, the book shows the importance of a strong contextual perspective for understanding the complexity of the architecture of global social governance and the variety of factors that shape this complexity and the resulting discourses.

中文翻译：

---

书评：社会研究与残疾。Ciaran Burke 和 Bronagh Byrne（编辑）为残疾研究人员开发包容性研究空间

他们不仅了解社会政策，还了解他们的组织方式、不同问题如何与他们投资组合中的其他主题联系起来，以及他们如何结合不同的世界观来传播思想。第三，由此涵盖了塑造话语的整个链条，从而产生了新的经验见解。第一个主要经验是 IO 在确定优先事项和构建不同领域方面所起的作用。例如，第二章解释了他们对塑造青年失业这一重要政策领域的贡献，教育成为许多国际组织的跨领域问题，导致了话语的趋同。在其他一些情况下，它可能会朝另一个方向发展。该领域本身的结构方式可能会影响 IO 的动态演变，与第 4 章中的移民和护理问题或第 11 章中的气候变化演变一样。IO 有助于确定优先事项和传播思想的方式反映在国家政策的有效性中。在第 13 章中，作者展示了粮食安全如何在今天仍然是一个基本问题，并断言 IO 是问题的一部分，表现出对解决问题的市场过于乐观的信任。第二个重要的教训是话语与 IO 的内在特征之间的联系，这也导致了与同一政策领域的其他 IO 的不同互动。国际劳工组织和世界银行这两个在全球社会政策治理中占主导地位的国际组织，其组织方式截然不同。它导致了相反的逻辑，劳工和移民问题（第 2 章），并且还支持随着时间的推移继续保持其主导地位。两个关键参与者的不同内在特征导致了社会和新自由主义之间关于全球劳工标准（第 3 章）、养老金（第 5 章）、南北家庭政策（第 8 章）和残疾（第 9 章）。总的来说，这本书展示了强烈的语境视角对于理解全球社会治理架构的复杂性以及塑造这种复杂性的各种因素以及由此产生的话语的重要性。养老金（第 5 章）、南北家庭政策（第 8 章）和残疾（第 9 章）。总的来说，这本书展示了强烈的语境视角对于理解全球社会治理架构的复杂性以及塑造这种复杂性的各种因素以及由此产生的话语的重要性。养老金（第 5 章）、南北家庭政策（第 8 章）和残疾（第 9 章）。总的来说，这本书展示了强烈的语境视角对于理解全球社会治理架构的复杂性以及塑造这种复杂性的各种因素以及由此产生的话语的重要性。